public legal vault

The Board of Health of the Marine Hospital for the State of California vs. The Pacific Mail S. S. Co. An action founded upon a statute to recover a pe...

Constant vs. Ward. Where notice of argument has been given by the appellant, the respondent may move for an affirmance of the judgment ex parte althou...

The People ex rel. Casserly vs. Fitch. The power of filling vacancies in office, vested in the governor of the state by Artí» ele V. section 8 of the ...

Rogers vs. Huie. Where a motion for a new trial is made on the ground that the party was taken by surprise at the trial by the non-attendance of witne...

Pierce vs. Minturn et al. An answer is a waiver of a demurrer previously interposed. ‘ Where the parties have not made a case, nor a bill of exception...

Ex parte The Queen of the Bay et al. Where five females are brought before the court on return to a writ of habeas corpus, and the person in whose cus...

Stowell et al. vs. Simmons et al. The case of Macondray v. Simmons, (ante, p. 393.) affirmed. By the Court, Bennett, J. The question in this case is w...

Correas vs. The City of San Francisco. The case of Dunbar v. The Ayuntamiento of San Francisco, (ante, p. 355,) affirmed. By the Court, BerNett, J. Th...

Ray vs. The Bark Henry Harbeck. The case of the Sea Witch, {ante, p, 162,) affirmed. By the Court, Bennett, J. Tbe Henry Harbech was not a vessel used...

Hoppe vs. Robb. Where there is conflicting evidence upon a point submitted to, and passed upon by a ‘jury, their verdict will not be disturbed •, and ...

Burt et al. vs. Scrantom et al. Where suit is brought' against a person in a county other than that in which he resides, he has thirty days within whi...

Tucker vs. The Bark Sacramento. The case of Souter v. The Sea Witch (ante,p. 162.) affirmed. By the Court, Bennett, J. The bark Sacramento was not a v...

Perry vs. Cochran. On a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, the newly discovered evidence should be fully set forth, or...

Tyson vs. Wells et al. Where an order granting a new trial was made in the court helow upon the payment of costs, and the defendants paid the costs, a...

Ex parte, Stephen J. Field. Where an order of the district court, fining and imprisoning for cor$ not specify on its face wfeerem the contempt consist...

The People, ex rel. Hagan vs. King. The case of the People, ex reí. Hughes v. Gillespie, {ante, p. 342,) confirmed, ——-, for the relator. Edward Norto...

In the Matter of the Wesleyan College. On an application for the incorporation of a College, a cash subscription of $27,500, with the subscription lis...

McFadden et al. vs. Jones et al. The case of Folsom v. Root, {ante, p. 374,) affirmed on the principle of stare decide. By the Court, Bennett, J. I ha...